shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CDNJS vs FakerAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICDNJSHEALTHY98FakerAPIDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%0.0%
Uptime · 30d100%0.0%
P50 · ms155—
P95 · ms936—
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree and open, no keyFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublished60 req/window · 59 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CDNJS vs FakerAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, CDNJS or FakerAPI?

On our scheduled checks, CDNJS leads on measured uptime — CDNJS at 100% versus FakerAPI at 0.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do CDNJS and FakerAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — CDNJS is callable with no signup, and FakerAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call CDNJS and FakerAPI from the browser?

Only CDNJS is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CDNJS and FakerAPI free for commercial use?

CDNJS has unclear commercial terms, and FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.