Catchdoms Security API vs RubyGems

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms437311
P95 · ms13981639
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Catchdoms Security API vs RubyGems: common questions

Which is more reliable, Catchdoms Security API or RubyGems?

On our scheduled checks, Catchdoms Security API leads on measured uptime — Catchdoms Security API at 100% versus RubyGems at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Catchdoms Security API or RubyGems?

RubyGems has the lower median latency in our checks — Catchdoms Security API responds in 437 ms versus RubyGems at 311 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Catchdoms Security API and RubyGems need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Catchdoms Security API is callable with no signup, and RubyGems is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Catchdoms Security API and RubyGems from the browser?

Only RubyGems is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Catchdoms Security API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Catchdoms Security API and RubyGems free for commercial use?

Catchdoms Security API has unclear commercial terms, and RubyGems has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.