Catchdoms Security API vs No-as-a-Service

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Catchdoms Security API vs No-as-a-Service: common questions

Which is more reliable, Catchdoms Security API or No-as-a-Service?

On our scheduled checks, No-as-a-Service leads on measured uptime — Catchdoms Security API at —% versus No-as-a-Service at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Catchdoms Security API and No-as-a-Service need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Catchdoms Security API is callable with no signup, and No-as-a-Service is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Catchdoms Security API and No-as-a-Service from the browser?

Only No-as-a-Service is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Catchdoms Security API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Catchdoms Security API and No-as-a-Service free for commercial use?

Catchdoms Security API has unclear commercial terms, and No-as-a-Service has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.