shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Catchdoms Security API vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICatchdoms Security APIHEALTHY93HunterHEALTHY96
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms437362
P95 · ms1398859
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Catchdoms Security API vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, Catchdoms Security API or Hunter?

Both are neck-and-neck — Catchdoms Security API and Hunter each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Catchdoms Security API or Hunter?

Hunter has the lower median latency in our checks — Catchdoms Security API responds in 437 ms versus Hunter at 362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Catchdoms Security API and Hunter need an API key?

Catchdoms Security API needs no key, while Hunter requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Catchdoms Security API first.

Can I call Catchdoms Security API and Hunter from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Catchdoms Security API and Hunter from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Catchdoms Security API and Hunter free for commercial use?

Catchdoms Security API has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.