Cataas vs HTTP Dog

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms60157
P95 · ms2357364
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Cataas vs HTTP Dog: common questions

Which is more reliable, Cataas or HTTP Dog?

Both are neck-and-neck — Cataas and HTTP Dog each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Cataas or HTTP Dog?

HTTP Dog has the lower median latency in our checks — Cataas responds in 601 ms versus HTTP Dog at 57 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Cataas and HTTP Dog need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Cataas is callable with no signup, and HTTP Dog is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Cataas and HTTP Dog from the browser?

Only Cataas is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. HTTP Dog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Cataas and HTTP Dog free for commercial use?

Cataas has unclear commercial terms, and HTTP Dog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.