CarVector vs Transport for Belgium

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%94.1%
Uptime · 30d100%90.0%
P50 · ms547567
P95 · ms18241576
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CarVector vs Transport for Belgium: common questions

Which is more reliable, CarVector or Transport for Belgium?

On our scheduled checks, CarVector leads on measured uptime — CarVector at 100% versus Transport for Belgium at 94.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, CarVector or Transport for Belgium?

CarVector has the lower median latency in our checks — CarVector responds in 547 ms versus Transport for Belgium at 567 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CarVector and Transport for Belgium need an API key?

Transport for Belgium needs no key, while CarVector requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Transport for Belgium first.

Can I call CarVector and Transport for Belgium from the browser?

Only Transport for Belgium is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. CarVector needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CarVector and Transport for Belgium free for commercial use?

CarVector has unclear commercial terms, and Transport for Belgium has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.