BVG transport.rest vs PikaSim

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d71.6%100%
Uptime · 30d66.7%100%
P50 · ms1106743
P95 · ms44314268
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

BVG transport.rest vs PikaSim: common questions

Which is more reliable, BVG transport.rest or PikaSim?

On our scheduled checks, PikaSim leads on measured uptime — BVG transport.rest at 71.6% versus PikaSim at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, BVG transport.rest or PikaSim?

PikaSim has the lower median latency in our checks — BVG transport.rest responds in 1106 ms versus PikaSim at 743 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do BVG transport.rest and PikaSim need an API key?

BVG transport.rest needs no key, while PikaSim requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for BVG transport.rest first.

Can I call BVG transport.rest and PikaSim from the browser?

Only BVG transport.rest is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. PikaSim needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are BVG transport.rest and PikaSim free for commercial use?

BVG transport.rest has unclear commercial terms, and PikaSim has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.