BuyWhere vs Eden

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms440475
P95 · ms1901926
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

BuyWhere vs Eden: common questions

Which is more reliable, BuyWhere or Eden?

On our scheduled checks, Eden leads on measured uptime — BuyWhere at 99.02% versus Eden at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, BuyWhere or Eden?

BuyWhere has the lower median latency in our checks — BuyWhere responds in 440 ms versus Eden at 475 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do BuyWhere and Eden need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — BuyWhere uses an API key and Eden uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call BuyWhere and Eden from the browser?

Only Eden is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. BuyWhere needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are BuyWhere and Eden free for commercial use?

BuyWhere has unclear commercial terms, and Eden has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.