Bufferapp vs Jobvetta

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms26385
P95 · ms1124215
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-25
operationalpartialdownno data

Bufferapp vs Jobvetta: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bufferapp or Jobvetta?

Both are neck-and-neck — Bufferapp and Jobvetta each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Bufferapp or Jobvetta?

Jobvetta has the lower median latency in our checks — Bufferapp responds in 263 ms versus Jobvetta at 85 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bufferapp and Jobvetta need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Bufferapp uses an API key and Jobvetta uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Bufferapp and Jobvetta from the browser?

Only Jobvetta is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Bufferapp needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Bufferapp and Jobvetta free for commercial use?

Bufferapp has unclear commercial terms, and Jobvetta has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.