Bufferapp vs Footer Year Update

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms547131
P95 · ms1124329
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bufferapp vs Footer Year Update: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bufferapp or Footer Year Update?

Both are neck-and-neck — Bufferapp and Footer Year Update each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Bufferapp or Footer Year Update?

Footer Year Update has the lower median latency in our checks — Bufferapp responds in 547 ms versus Footer Year Update at 131 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bufferapp and Footer Year Update need an API key?

Footer Year Update needs no key, while Bufferapp requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Footer Year Update first.

Can I call Bufferapp and Footer Year Update from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Bufferapp and Footer Year Update from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Bufferapp and Footer Year Update free for commercial use?

Bufferapp has unclear commercial terms, and Footer Year Update has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.