btcnode.uk vs Sharpe

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.8%97.8%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms3981460
P95 · ms41104226
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit300 req/window · 298 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

btcnode.uk vs Sharpe: common questions

Which is more reliable, btcnode.uk or Sharpe?

Both are neck-and-neck — btcnode.uk and Sharpe each measure 97.8% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, btcnode.uk or Sharpe?

btcnode.uk has the lower median latency in our checks — btcnode.uk responds in 398 ms versus Sharpe at 1460 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do btcnode.uk and Sharpe need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — btcnode.uk is callable with no signup, and Sharpe is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call btcnode.uk and Sharpe from the browser?

Only Sharpe is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. btcnode.uk needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are btcnode.uk and Sharpe free for commercial use?

btcnode.uk has unclear commercial terms, and Sharpe has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.