Bscscan vs VALR

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d27.5%100%
Uptime · 30d40.0%100%
P50 · ms179696
P95 · ms5223273
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bscscan vs VALR: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bscscan or VALR?

On our scheduled checks, VALR leads on measured uptime — Bscscan at 27.5% versus VALR at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Bscscan or VALR?

Bscscan has the lower median latency in our checks — Bscscan responds in 179 ms versus VALR at 696 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bscscan and VALR need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Bscscan uses an API key and VALR uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Bscscan and VALR from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Bscscan and VALR from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Bscscan and VALR free for commercial use?

Bscscan has unclear commercial terms, and VALR has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.