shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Browshot vs Randommer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBrowshotDEAD0RandommerDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%0.0%
Uptime · 30d0.0%0.0%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Browshot vs Randommer: common questions

Which is more reliable, Browshot or Randommer?

Both are neck-and-neck — Browshot and Randommer each measure 0.0% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Do Browshot and Randommer need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Browshot uses an API key and Randommer uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Browshot and Randommer from the browser?

Only Randommer is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Browshot needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Browshot and Randommer free for commercial use?

Browshot has unclear commercial terms, and Randommer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.