shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Browshot vs Beeceptor

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBrowshotNEW—BeeceptorNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree public echo host, no signup
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Browshot vs Beeceptor: common questions

Which is more reliable, Browshot or Beeceptor?

On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — Browshot at —% versus Beeceptor at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Browshot and Beeceptor need an API key?

Beeceptor needs no key, while Browshot requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Beeceptor first.

Can I call Browshot and Beeceptor from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Browshot needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Browshot and Beeceptor free for commercial use?

Browshot has unclear commercial terms, and Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.