Brazil vs City, Lviv

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%74.5%
Uptime · 30d100%70.0%
P50 · ms122965
P95 · ms8622301
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no key (beta)Free — limits not published
Rate limitFair use — no loops or full-range scanningUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Brazil vs City, Lviv: common questions

Which is more reliable, Brazil or City, Lviv?

On our scheduled checks, Brazil leads on measured uptime — Brazil at 100% versus City, Lviv at 74.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Brazil or City, Lviv?

Brazil has the lower median latency in our checks — Brazil responds in 122 ms versus City, Lviv at 965 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Brazil and City, Lviv need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Brazil is callable with no signup, and City, Lviv is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Brazil and City, Lviv from the browser?

Only Brazil is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. City, Lviv needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Brazil and City, Lviv free for commercial use?

Brazil has unclear commercial terms, and City, Lviv has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.