BotsArchive vs Web of Science API Expanded
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
BotsArchive vs Web of Science API Expanded: common questions
Which is more reliable, BotsArchive or Web of Science API Expanded?
On our scheduled checks, Web of Science API Expanded leads on measured uptime — BotsArchive at 97.1% versus Web of Science API Expanded at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, BotsArchive or Web of Science API Expanded?
Web of Science API Expanded has the lower median latency in our checks — BotsArchive responds in 790 ms versus Web of Science API Expanded at 787 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do BotsArchive and Web of Science API Expanded need an API key?
BotsArchive needs no key, while Web of Science API Expanded requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for BotsArchive first.
Can I call BotsArchive and Web of Science API Expanded from the browser?
Only BotsArchive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Web of Science API Expanded needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are BotsArchive and Web of Science API Expanded free for commercial use?
BotsArchive has unclear commercial terms, and Web of Science API Expanded has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.