BotsArchive vs Warnely
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
BotsArchive vs Warnely: common questions
Which is more reliable, BotsArchive or Warnely?
On our scheduled checks, BotsArchive leads on measured uptime — BotsArchive at 97.1% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, BotsArchive or Warnely?
Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — BotsArchive responds in 790 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do BotsArchive and Warnely need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — BotsArchive is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call BotsArchive and Warnely from the browser?
Only BotsArchive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Warnely needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are BotsArchive and Warnely free for commercial use?
BotsArchive has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.