BotsArchive vs Stytch

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.1%100%
Uptime · 30d95.0%100%
P50 · ms790577
P95 · ms44481314
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

BotsArchive vs Stytch: common questions

Which is more reliable, BotsArchive or Stytch?

On our scheduled checks, Stytch leads on measured uptime — BotsArchive at 97.1% versus Stytch at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, BotsArchive or Stytch?

Stytch has the lower median latency in our checks — BotsArchive responds in 790 ms versus Stytch at 577 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do BotsArchive and Stytch need an API key?

BotsArchive needs no key, while Stytch requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for BotsArchive first.

Can I call BotsArchive and Stytch from the browser?

Only BotsArchive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Stytch needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are BotsArchive and Stytch free for commercial use?

BotsArchive has unclear commercial terms, and Stytch has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.