BotsArchive vs RSS2JSON

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.1%96.1%
Uptime · 30d95.0%96.7%
P50 · ms790178
P95 · ms44481882
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

BotsArchive vs RSS2JSON: common questions

Which is more reliable, BotsArchive or RSS2JSON?

On our scheduled checks, BotsArchive leads on measured uptime — BotsArchive at 97.1% versus RSS2JSON at 96.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, BotsArchive or RSS2JSON?

RSS2JSON has the lower median latency in our checks — BotsArchive responds in 790 ms versus RSS2JSON at 178 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do BotsArchive and RSS2JSON need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — BotsArchive is callable with no signup, and RSS2JSON is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call BotsArchive and RSS2JSON from the browser?

Yes — both BotsArchive and RSS2JSON send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are BotsArchive and RSS2JSON free for commercial use?

BotsArchive has unclear commercial terms, and RSS2JSON has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.