BotsArchive vs Micro User Service

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.1%18.6%
Uptime · 30d95.0%0.0%
P50 · ms790231
P95 · ms4448827
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

BotsArchive vs Micro User Service: common questions

Which is more reliable, BotsArchive or Micro User Service?

On our scheduled checks, BotsArchive leads on measured uptime — BotsArchive at 97.1% versus Micro User Service at 18.6% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, BotsArchive or Micro User Service?

Micro User Service has the lower median latency in our checks — BotsArchive responds in 790 ms versus Micro User Service at 231 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do BotsArchive and Micro User Service need an API key?

BotsArchive needs no key, while Micro User Service requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for BotsArchive first.

Can I call BotsArchive and Micro User Service from the browser?

Only BotsArchive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Micro User Service needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are BotsArchive and Micro User Service free for commercial use?

BotsArchive has unclear commercial terms, and Micro User Service has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.