Bootprint vs Noctua

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms67742
P95 · ms2912037
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bootprint vs Noctua: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bootprint or Noctua?

Both are neck-and-neck — Bootprint and Noctua each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Bootprint or Noctua?

Bootprint has the lower median latency in our checks — Bootprint responds in 67 ms versus Noctua at 742 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bootprint and Noctua need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Bootprint is callable with no signup, and Noctua is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Bootprint and Noctua from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Bootprint and Noctua from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Bootprint and Noctua free for commercial use?

Bootprint has unclear commercial terms, and Noctua has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.