Bluesky vs mailboxlayer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.3%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms208208
P95 · ms12002634
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — public AppView, no keyFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bluesky vs mailboxlayer: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bluesky or mailboxlayer?

On our scheduled checks, mailboxlayer leads on measured uptime — Bluesky at 98.3% versus mailboxlayer at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Bluesky or mailboxlayer?

They're evenly matched on speed — both Bluesky and mailboxlayer post a 208 ms median (P50) in our checks. Look at the P95 row above if worst-case latency matters more than the typical response for your use case.

Do Bluesky and mailboxlayer need an API key?

Bluesky needs no key, while mailboxlayer requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Bluesky first.

Can I call Bluesky and mailboxlayer from the browser?

Only Bluesky is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. mailboxlayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Bluesky and mailboxlayer free for commercial use?

Bluesky has unclear commercial terms, and mailboxlayer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.