Bluesky vs Disify

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.1%42.2%
Uptime · 30d100%28.3%
P50 · ms2681075
P95 · ms12001679
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — public AppView, no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished30 req/window · 21 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bluesky vs Disify: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bluesky or Disify?

On our scheduled checks, Bluesky leads on measured uptime — Bluesky at 97.1% versus Disify at 42.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Bluesky or Disify?

Bluesky has the lower median latency in our checks — Bluesky responds in 268 ms versus Disify at 1075 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bluesky and Disify need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Bluesky is callable with no signup, and Disify is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Bluesky and Disify from the browser?

Only Bluesky is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Disify needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Bluesky and Disify free for commercial use?

Bluesky has unclear commercial terms, and Disify has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.