shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

BlockCypher vs Trading View

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBlockCypherDYING59Trading ViewHEALTHY93
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d30.4%100%
Uptime · 30d36.7%100%
P50 · ms145511
P95 · ms11291648
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitRetry-After: 1787sUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

BlockCypher vs Trading View: common questions

Which is more reliable, BlockCypher or Trading View?

On our scheduled checks, Trading View leads on measured uptime — BlockCypher at 30.4% versus Trading View at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, BlockCypher or Trading View?

BlockCypher has the lower median latency in our checks — BlockCypher responds in 145 ms versus Trading View at 511 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do BlockCypher and Trading View need an API key?

BlockCypher needs no key, while Trading View requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for BlockCypher first.

Can I call BlockCypher and Trading View from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call BlockCypher and Trading View from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are BlockCypher and Trading View free for commercial use?

BlockCypher has unclear commercial terms, and Trading View has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.