Blockchair vs CryptAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms729496
P95 · ms13231103
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree API; provider takes ~1% fee per forwarded payment
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Blockchair vs CryptAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Blockchair or CryptAPI?

On our scheduled checks, CryptAPI leads on measured uptime — Blockchair at 98.0% versus CryptAPI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Blockchair or CryptAPI?

CryptAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — Blockchair responds in 729 ms versus CryptAPI at 496 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Blockchair and CryptAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Blockchair is callable with no signup, and CryptAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Blockchair and CryptAPI from the browser?

Yes — both Blockchair and CryptAPI send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Blockchair and CryptAPI free for commercial use?

Blockchair has unclear commercial terms, and CryptAPI allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.