Block Lottos vs DexPaprika

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%99.02%
Uptime · 30d96.7%100%
P50 · ms1025430
P95 · ms36582202
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree, no key (API docs state no key required)Free — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Block Lottos vs DexPaprika: common questions

Which is more reliable, Block Lottos or DexPaprika?

On our scheduled checks, DexPaprika leads on measured uptime — Block Lottos at 98.0% versus DexPaprika at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Block Lottos or DexPaprika?

DexPaprika has the lower median latency in our checks — Block Lottos responds in 1025 ms versus DexPaprika at 430 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Block Lottos and DexPaprika need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Block Lottos is callable with no signup, and DexPaprika is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Block Lottos and DexPaprika from the browser?

Only Block Lottos is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. DexPaprika needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Block Lottos and DexPaprika free for commercial use?

Block Lottos has unclear commercial terms, and DexPaprika has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.