shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Bitbucket vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBitbucketNEW—HunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bitbucket vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bitbucket or Hunter?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — Bitbucket at —% versus Hunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Bitbucket and Hunter need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Bitbucket uses an API key and Hunter uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Bitbucket and Hunter from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Bitbucket and Hunter from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Bitbucket and Hunter free for commercial use?

Bitbucket has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.