shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Beeceptor vs What The Commit

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBeeceptorHEALTHY89What The CommitHEALTHY79
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms7501312
P95 · ms37154279
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesno
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs What The Commit: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or What The Commit?

On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at 100% versus What The Commit at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Beeceptor or What The Commit?

Beeceptor has the lower median latency in our checks — Beeceptor responds in 750 ms versus What The Commit at 1312 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Beeceptor and What The Commit need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and What The Commit is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and What The Commit from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. What The Commit needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Beeceptor and What The Commit free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and What The Commit has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.