shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Beeceptor vs staffSign

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBeeceptorNEW—staffSignNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs staffSign: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or staffSign?

On our scheduled checks, staffSign leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at —% versus staffSign at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Beeceptor and staffSign need an API key?

Beeceptor needs no key, while staffSign requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Beeceptor first.

Can I call Beeceptor and staffSign from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. staffSign needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Beeceptor and staffSign free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and staffSign has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.