Beeceptor vs OOPSpam

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished1000 req/window · 999 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs OOPSpam: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or OOPSpam?

On our scheduled checks, OOPSpam leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at —% versus OOPSpam at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Beeceptor and OOPSpam need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and OOPSpam is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and OOPSpam from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. OOPSpam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Beeceptor and OOPSpam free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and OOPSpam has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.