shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Beeceptor vs ItsThisForThat

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBeeceptorHEALTHY89ItsThisForThatHEALTHY98
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms750242
P95 · ms3715555
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs ItsThisForThat: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or ItsThisForThat?

Both are neck-and-neck — Beeceptor and ItsThisForThat each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Beeceptor or ItsThisForThat?

ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — Beeceptor responds in 750 ms versus ItsThisForThat at 242 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Beeceptor and ItsThisForThat need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and ItsThisForThat from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ItsThisForThat needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Beeceptor and ItsThisForThat free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.