shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Beeceptor vs Image-Charts

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBeeceptorHEALTHY89Image-ChartsHEALTHY99
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms75080
P95 · ms3715499
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs Image-Charts: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or Image-Charts?

On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at 100% versus Image-Charts at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Beeceptor or Image-Charts?

Image-Charts has the lower median latency in our checks — Beeceptor responds in 750 ms versus Image-Charts at 80 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Beeceptor and Image-Charts need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and Image-Charts is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and Image-Charts from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Image-Charts needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Beeceptor and Image-Charts free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and Image-Charts has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.