shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Beeceptor vs Icanhazip

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBeeceptorNEW—IcanhazipNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs Icanhazip: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or Icanhazip?

On our scheduled checks, Icanhazip leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at —% versus Icanhazip at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Beeceptor and Icanhazip need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and Icanhazip is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and Icanhazip from the browser?

Yes — both Beeceptor and Icanhazip send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Beeceptor and Icanhazip free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.