Beeceptor vs Hoppscotch

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms750552
P95 · ms37152519
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs Hoppscotch: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or Hoppscotch?

Both are neck-and-neck — Beeceptor and Hoppscotch each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Beeceptor or Hoppscotch?

Hoppscotch has the lower median latency in our checks — Beeceptor responds in 750 ms versus Hoppscotch at 552 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Beeceptor and Hoppscotch need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and Hoppscotch is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and Hoppscotch from the browser?

Yes — both Beeceptor and Hoppscotch send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Beeceptor and Hoppscotch free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and Hoppscotch has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.