Beeceptor vs English Random Words

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%74.5%
Uptime · 30d100%71.7%
P50 · ms750592
P95 · ms37152126
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished30 req/window · 6 remaining · resets 585
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs English Random Words: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or English Random Words?

On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at 100% versus English Random Words at 74.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Beeceptor or English Random Words?

English Random Words has the lower median latency in our checks — Beeceptor responds in 750 ms versus English Random Words at 592 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Beeceptor and English Random Words need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and English Random Words is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and English Random Words from the browser?

Yes — both Beeceptor and English Random Words send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Beeceptor and English Random Words free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and English Random Words has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.