Beeceptor vs DownStatus

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%60.8%
Uptime · 30d100%33.3%
P50 · ms750589
P95 · ms37151295
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree public echo host, no signupFree — no API key (per docs)
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Beeceptor vs DownStatus: common questions

Which is more reliable, Beeceptor or DownStatus?

On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — Beeceptor at 100% versus DownStatus at 60.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Beeceptor or DownStatus?

DownStatus has the lower median latency in our checks — Beeceptor responds in 750 ms versus DownStatus at 589 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Beeceptor and DownStatus need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Beeceptor is callable with no signup, and DownStatus is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Beeceptor and DownStatus from the browser?

Only Beeceptor is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. DownStatus needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Beeceptor and DownStatus free for commercial use?

Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms, and DownStatus has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.