shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs Zelda

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netNEW—ZeldaNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs Zelda: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or Zelda?

On our scheduled checks, Zelda leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at —% versus Zelda at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Battle.net and Zelda need an API key?

Zelda needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Zelda first.

Can I call Battle.net and Zelda from the browser?

Only Zelda is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and Zelda free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and Zelda has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.