shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs Scryfall

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netHEALTHY85ScryfallHEALTHY71
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%96.1%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms1024470
P95 · ms31732767
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedCard data free to use; MTG content © Wizards of the Coast (see docs)
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublished~10 requests/second; docs ask for 50-100 ms between requests
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs Scryfall: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or Scryfall?

On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at 100% versus Scryfall at 96.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Battle.net or Scryfall?

Scryfall has the lower median latency in our checks — Battle.net responds in 1024 ms versus Scryfall at 470 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Battle.net and Scryfall need an API key?

Scryfall needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Scryfall first.

Can I call Battle.net and Scryfall from the browser?

Only Scryfall is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and Scryfall free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and Scryfall has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.