shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs GDBrowser

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netHEALTHY86GDBrowserHEALTHY97
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.04%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1017201
P95 · ms3173872
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — no API key
Rate limitUnpublished150 req/window · 149 remaining · resets 1783513202
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs GDBrowser: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or GDBrowser?

On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at 100% versus GDBrowser at 99.04% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Battle.net or GDBrowser?

GDBrowser has the lower median latency in our checks — Battle.net responds in 1017 ms versus GDBrowser at 201 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Battle.net and GDBrowser need an API key?

GDBrowser needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for GDBrowser first.

Can I call Battle.net and GDBrowser from the browser?

Only GDBrowser is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and GDBrowser free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and GDBrowser has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.