Battle.net vs GamerPower

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms703158
P95 · ms21711601
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs GamerPower: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or GamerPower?

On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at 100% versus GamerPower at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Battle.net or GamerPower?

GamerPower has the lower median latency in our checks — Battle.net responds in 703 ms versus GamerPower at 158 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Battle.net and GamerPower need an API key?

GamerPower needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for GamerPower first.

Can I call Battle.net and GamerPower from the browser?

Only GamerPower is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and GamerPower free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and GamerPower has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.