shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs FreeToGame

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netNEW—FreeToGameNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs FreeToGame: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or FreeToGame?

On our scheduled checks, FreeToGame leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at —% versus FreeToGame at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Battle.net and FreeToGame need an API key?

FreeToGame needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FreeToGame first.

Can I call Battle.net and FreeToGame from the browser?

Only FreeToGame is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and FreeToGame free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and FreeToGame has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.