shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs Disney

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netHEALTHY85DisneyHEALTHY83
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%79.4%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms1024409
P95 · ms3173935
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs Disney: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or Disney?

On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at 100% versus Disney at 79.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Battle.net or Disney?

Disney has the lower median latency in our checks — Battle.net responds in 1024 ms versus Disney at 409 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Battle.net and Disney need an API key?

Disney needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Disney first.

Can I call Battle.net and Disney from the browser?

Only Disney is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and Disney free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and Disney has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.