shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs CheapShark

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netUNMONITORED—CheapSharkNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs CheapShark: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or CheapShark?

Only CheapShark is on our probe schedule so far (—% uptime over 90 days). The other is catalogued but not yet live-checked, so we can't compare measured reliability head-to-head — check the uncovered API's own status page for now.

Do Battle.net and CheapShark need an API key?

CheapShark needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CheapShark first.

Can I call Battle.net and CheapShark from the browser?

Only CheapShark is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Battle.net and CheapShark free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and CheapShark has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.