Battle.net vs CheapShark
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Battle.net vs CheapShark: common questions
Which is more reliable, Battle.net or CheapShark?
On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at 100% versus CheapShark at 95.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Battle.net or CheapShark?
Battle.net has the lower median latency in our checks — Battle.net responds in 1024 ms versus CheapShark at 1975 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Battle.net and CheapShark need an API key?
CheapShark needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CheapShark first.
Can I call Battle.net and CheapShark from the browser?
Only CheapShark is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Battle.net and CheapShark free for commercial use?
Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and CheapShark has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.