shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Battle.net vs Call of Duty Mobile

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIBattle.netHEALTHY85Call of Duty MobileHEALTHY79
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms10243317
P95 · ms31734193
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — no API key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Battle.net vs Call of Duty Mobile: common questions

Which is more reliable, Battle.net or Call of Duty Mobile?

On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Battle.net at 100% versus Call of Duty Mobile at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Battle.net or Call of Duty Mobile?

Battle.net has the lower median latency in our checks — Battle.net responds in 1024 ms versus Call of Duty Mobile at 3317 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Battle.net and Call of Duty Mobile need an API key?

Call of Duty Mobile needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Call of Duty Mobile first.

Can I call Battle.net and Call of Duty Mobile from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Battle.net and Call of Duty Mobile from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Battle.net and Call of Duty Mobile free for commercial use?

Battle.net has unclear commercial terms, and Call of Duty Mobile has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.