Barter.VG vs Wynncraft

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms256778
P95 · ms8212871
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Barter.VG vs Wynncraft: common questions

Which is more reliable, Barter.VG or Wynncraft?

On our scheduled checks, Wynncraft leads on measured uptime — Barter.VG at 99.02% versus Wynncraft at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Barter.VG or Wynncraft?

Barter.VG has the lower median latency in our checks — Barter.VG responds in 256 ms versus Wynncraft at 778 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Barter.VG and Wynncraft need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Barter.VG is callable with no signup, and Wynncraft is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Barter.VG and Wynncraft from the browser?

Only Barter.VG is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wynncraft needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Barter.VG and Wynncraft free for commercial use?

Barter.VG has unclear commercial terms, and Wynncraft has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.