Barter.VG vs PlayerDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms16344
P95 · ms821381
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree, no API key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Barter.VG vs PlayerDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, Barter.VG or PlayerDB?

Both are neck-and-neck — Barter.VG and PlayerDB each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Barter.VG or PlayerDB?

PlayerDB has the lower median latency in our checks — Barter.VG responds in 163 ms versus PlayerDB at 44 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Barter.VG and PlayerDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Barter.VG is callable with no signup, and PlayerDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Barter.VG and PlayerDB from the browser?

Yes — both Barter.VG and PlayerDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Barter.VG and PlayerDB free for commercial use?

Barter.VG has unclear commercial terms, and PlayerDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.