Bank of Russia vs Exchangerate.dev
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Bank of Russia vs Exchangerate.dev: common questions
Which is more reliable, Bank of Russia or Exchangerate.dev?
On our scheduled checks, Bank of Russia leads on measured uptime — Bank of Russia at 100% versus Exchangerate.dev at 71.6% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Bank of Russia or Exchangerate.dev?
Exchangerate.dev has the lower median latency in our checks — Bank of Russia responds in 648 ms versus Exchangerate.dev at 336 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Bank of Russia and Exchangerate.dev need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Bank of Russia is callable with no signup, and Exchangerate.dev is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Bank of Russia and Exchangerate.dev from the browser?
Yes — both Bank of Russia and Exchangerate.dev send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Bank of Russia and Exchangerate.dev free for commercial use?
Bank of Russia has unclear commercial terms, and Exchangerate.dev has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.