Bank of Russia vs Coinnect

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms6481419
P95 · ms43393727
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (underlying rates are official Bank of Russia public data)Unverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bank of Russia vs Coinnect: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bank of Russia or Coinnect?

On our scheduled checks, Bank of Russia leads on measured uptime — Bank of Russia at 100% versus Coinnect at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Bank of Russia or Coinnect?

Bank of Russia has the lower median latency in our checks — Bank of Russia responds in 648 ms versus Coinnect at 1419 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bank of Russia and Coinnect need an API key?

Bank of Russia needs no key, while Coinnect requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Bank of Russia first.

Can I call Bank of Russia and Coinnect from the browser?

Only Bank of Russia is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Coinnect needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Bank of Russia and Coinnect free for commercial use?

Bank of Russia has unclear commercial terms, and Coinnect has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.