Bacon Ipsum vs ItsThisForThat

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms359242
P95 · ms1328555
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished (docs ask you not to hammer it)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Bacon Ipsum vs ItsThisForThat: common questions

Which is more reliable, Bacon Ipsum or ItsThisForThat?

On our scheduled checks, ItsThisForThat leads on measured uptime — Bacon Ipsum at 99.02% versus ItsThisForThat at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Bacon Ipsum or ItsThisForThat?

ItsThisForThat has the lower median latency in our checks — Bacon Ipsum responds in 359 ms versus ItsThisForThat at 242 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Bacon Ipsum and ItsThisForThat need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Bacon Ipsum is callable with no signup, and ItsThisForThat is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Bacon Ipsum and ItsThisForThat from the browser?

Only Bacon Ipsum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ItsThisForThat needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Bacon Ipsum and ItsThisForThat free for commercial use?

Bacon Ipsum has unclear commercial terms, and ItsThisForThat has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.