AZ511 vs StayingAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d91.1%100%
Uptime · 30d85.0%100%
P50 · ms1440143
P95 · ms4972913
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-09-21
operationalpartialdownno data

AZ511 vs StayingAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, AZ511 or StayingAPI?

On our scheduled checks, StayingAPI leads on measured uptime — AZ511 at 91.1% versus StayingAPI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, AZ511 or StayingAPI?

StayingAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — AZ511 responds in 1440 ms versus StayingAPI at 143 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AZ511 and StayingAPI need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — AZ511 uses an API key and StayingAPI uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call AZ511 and StayingAPI from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call AZ511 and StayingAPI from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are AZ511 and StayingAPI free for commercial use?

AZ511 has unclear commercial terms, and StayingAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.